Ron Paul Didn't Expect This Response From Hillary Clinton - 4/22/2009
Uploaded by: RonPaulcom
Video Description:
Ron Paul questions Hillary Clinton and gets an unexpected response. Transcript at http://www.ronpaul.com/2009-04-22/ron-paul-questions-hillary-clinton-on-foreign-policy-priorities/
Tags for this video: clinton hillary ron paul foreign policy obama afghanistan iraq war revolution president
Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by RonPaulcom
| Hillary Snaps On Student | a younger Obama Speaking about the legalization of drugs | Who Owns The Federal Reserve System 1988- It's time to take a second look at Ron Paul America!! |
 |  |  |
| Hillary Clinton Farts! | Hillary's Hissy Fit: An Unexpected Outburst From Mrs Clinton | Bill Clinton Denied a Kiss from Hillary |
 |  |  |
Share This Video:
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:
Yeah, not one person has the duplicity to say they are against government state hand outs and then takes them anyway... Thanks Tim Russert for knocking Ron Paul down a notch and exposing him. There's "some intelligence -4- -u-" : )
Wow, a speech. Im sure those chinamen were pissing their pants because NOBODY has ever given a speech against china before.
I really can't fathom how "dishing out the funds to these muther fuckers who lied and stole" makes the government good.
I already saw that guy try to take down ron but I also read ron pauls defense and it sounded reasonable.
Also, as for the "no" part.
Well, his nickname is dr no. In fact there were several bill in which he was the only one who voted against it.
Sorry, but that's untrue. This is a guy who puts earmarks in a bill, then tells people he's really against earmarks... That's beyond wishy washy--it shows he hasn't a pair. I'm against bank robberies, but hey, if a bank is robbed and they escape, let the money fall out of their car on MY street. That's how silly Ron Paul is. Besides his duplicity, the 2nd problem with him is he's a Republican...he's not any different.
"It sounded reasonable"... The republicans used to heckle Kerry and say he was for it before he was against it... and Ron Paul is actually doing this now with earmarks.. He's against them--but he'll put them in a bill anyway. Idiot.
Hillary Clinton is probably the most powerful woman in modern politics... like her or hate her...and her popularity has even exceeded Obama's per several polls over the last year and a half. Actually, the Chinese government -was- afraid if Hillary would have been President--but I digress. You want to talk about Hillary, but that isn't going to give Ron Paul any more substance.
I love the way you guys defend this man no matter WHAT he does...to you he's without fault--hilarious.
Rather than attack Hillary or repeat your point his defense against Russert "sounded reasonable" why don't you address the other multitude of points below in these posts that i've raised?
It's truly amazing, it really is...how Ron Paul supporters blindly support this man--and cannot find any fault with him, and defend -everything- he does. Even the candidates I support I can find these about them I'm not 100% with.
When people cannot admit someone has faults--that's a red flag.
I never said that he was perfect. Your argument that just because i defended him on only 2 or 3 points means that im a fanatic is stupid and arrogant. I don't agree with him on everything. I just think that his defense in regards to earmarks is reasonable. He still voted against every one of them so you could argue that if every congressman was ron paul then there would be no earmarks.
Its an eyebrow raiser, but its not near enough to make me hate him.
by the way, you said " You want to talk about Hillary, but that isn't going to give Ron Paul any more substance." Your the one who started on about hillary. I never had any intention of bringing her into this until you brought her up.
Also, I don't know why you brought up the republican thing since im not republican, unless your one of those retards who assumes that anybody who disagrees with them is a neocon who watches glen beck every day.
I never said you were a Republican. I don't appreciate your message here and the name calling--So I'm choosing not to communicate with you further. Thanks for the past exchanges.
Thank God she's SOS. At least we have someone with a pair looking out for this country on a higher management level close to Obama's.
Note to self: When making youtube comments, type it all in caps--that helps the credibility--nevermind sources right? : P
LOL.
He isn't a libertarian--he's a Republican. He's not "really a" whatever. If he WAS a Libertarian, he would have run on the Libertarian ticket. Can we please remain in the realm of reality? If you are saying he philosophically is "more Libertarian" in views than his GOP counterparts--Then I ask you this...
Why didn't he run with the Libertarian party? I already know the answer to the question, but would like to hear your answer. : )
I was referring to all the "generalized" posts about how great this man is, and how they all ignore anything bad about him--not you in particular.
So now you are calling me dumb...communication at its finest. Ha. My entire point was is that he is not that revolutionary... running with the ranks of Republicans no matter what he is "at heart"...because he is still under the ticket. If he doesn't agree with Republicans, he shouldn't be RUNNING AS ONE. Quite a simple concept.
CONT'D